加载中... --°C -- · --% · --
|
加载中... --°C -- · --% · --

US can’t deport hate speech researcher for protected speech, lawsuit says

US can’t deport hate speech researcher for protected speech, lawsuit says
摘要

美国仇恨言论研究者伊姆兰·艾哈迈德原计划在圣诞节前被特朗普政府驱逐出境并禁止返回美国。艾哈迈德随后起诉美国政府,并在圣诞节当天获得临时限制令。他指控当局滥用移民系统,以惩罚非公民受保护的言论并压制不同观点。

Imran Ahmed's biggest thorn in his side used to be Elon Musk, who made the hate speech researcher one of his earliest legal foes during his Twitter takeover.

Now, it's the Trump administration, which planned to deport Ahmed, a legal permanent resident, just before Christmas. It would then ban him from returning to the United States, where he lives with his wife and young child, both US citizens.

After suing US officials to block any attempted arrest or deportation, Ahmed was quickly granted a temporary restraining order on Christmas Day. Ahmed had successfully argued that he risked irreparable harm without the order, alleging that Trump officials continue "to abuse the immigration system to punish and punitively detain noncitizens for protected speech and silence viewpoints with which it disagrees" and confirming that his speech had been chilled.

Read full article

Comments

转载信息
原文: US can’t deport hate speech researcher for protected speech, lawsuit says (2025-12-29T21:30:29)
作者: Ashley Belanger 分类: 科技
评论 (4)
登录 后发表评论
韩4828
韩4828
2026-01-18 01:00
这研究太有必要了
64531090
64531090
2026-01-17 01:00
这个话题真有意思,看来言论自由和学术研究之间的界限确实挺微妙的。我之前也在想,研究敏感话题会不会有风险呢?这篇文章让我对学术研究的边界有了新认识。不过话说回来,如果研究内容真的可能伤害他人,那该怎么平衡呢?感觉这类研究还是需要更明确的伦理指导吧。收藏了,有空再仔细看看。
85386824
85386824
2026-01-15 04:00
行吧
6551807345
6551807345
2026-01-13 04:00
这个案例确实引人深思,但我不禁想问,保护言论自由与防止仇恨言论传播之间的界限该如何把握?毕竟研究仇恨 speech本身也可能带来风险。